Get in Touch

Course Outline

Day 1: Build the Foundation — Ingest, Search, Retrieve

Module 1: The Legal Engineer’s Landscape

  • Learning objectives — understand the role, where AI fits within legal work, and the two critical risks that permeate the field.
  • Topics
    • The legal-engineer role and its current market demand.
    • Where AI fits: eDiscovery, review, contracts, research, investigations; the EDRM model explained simply.
    • Build vs. buy considerations.
    • The two pervasive risks: confidentiality/privilege and defensibility.

Module 2: Legal Data Is Messy — Ingestion and Extraction

  • Learning objectives — handle the reality of legal data at scale.
  • Topics
    • Handling 1,400+ file types, email and PST files, scanned paper, load files (.dat/.opt); understanding crucial embedded metadata.
    • Text extraction (Tika), OCR, and de-duplication strategies.
  • Lab: FreeEed Ingestion — build an ingestion pipeline over a deliberately messy document set (email/PST, scans, load files).

Module 3: Search and Retrieval — the Foundation

  • Learning objectives — build the core eDiscovery primitive: finding anything within everything.
  • Topics — full-text search and indexing (Solr/Lucene); relevance, metadata and date filtering; searching across OCR'd content.
  • Lab: eDiscovery Search — index a corpus and run real eDiscovery-style searches, including within OCR'd scans.

Module 4: RAG for Legal Documents — with Citations

  • Learning objectives — build RAG over legal documents that cites its sources accurately.
  • Topics
    • Why retrieval, not fine-tuning, is preferred for sensitive material — the model never ingests the raw documents directly.
    • Chunking, embeddings, and crucially citations/provenance.
    • Multi-document and thread summarization techniques.
  • Lab: Legal RAG with Citations — build a RAG Q&A system over a document set that answers questions with source citations.

Day 2: Make It Private, Defensible, and Shippable

Module 5: Privacy, Privilege, and Local Serving — the Privilege Trap

  • Learning objectives — keep legal data local and provide certification for its security.
  • Topics
    • Data flow when interacting with cloud AI services.
    • Privilege waiver, duty of competence, and the 'private' spectrum (contractual vs. physical).
    • The significance of Morgan v. V2X and why local deployment is court-defensible.
    • Serving local models (Ollama/vLLM) and monitoring outbound traffic.
  • Lab: Local Model + Egress Proof — run a local model end-to-end and prove, via monitoring, that no data has left the environment.

Module 6: Defensible AI Review

  • Learning objectives — measure and document an AI review process so it withstands legal scrutiny.
  • Topics
    • Critical metrics for court: recall, elusion, precision, ground-truth validation; TAR/active learning principles.
    • Transparency (why did the system code this document?) and reproducibility — pinning the model version, fixing settings, and logging every step.
    • The 'defensible case snapshot' allowing someone to re-run your review a year later with identical results.
  • Lab: Defensible Review — measure an AI review against a blind ground truth and produce a reproducibility bundle.

Module 7: Ship It — Workflow, Private Deployment, and Governance

  • Learning objectives — assemble the components into a workflow, deploy privately, and score performance.
  • Topics
    • A multi-step legal workflow (ingest → search → summarize → review → produce) incorporating human-in-the-loop processes.
    • Essentials of private/on-premises deployment (containerization; keeping data within the building).
    • AI governance for legal in brief, and scoring the system using SAIS-100 (the Elephant Scale Secure AI Score).
  • Lab: Score and Package — wire a multi-step workflow, score it with SAIS-100, and package it for private deployment.

Capstone (integrated across Day 2)

  • Build a private, defensible legal-AI application end-to-end — ingest a messy corpus, search it, answer questions with citations using a local model, measure a defensible review, and package it for private deployment.
  • Participants leave with a portfolio project that mirrors the actual work of a legal engineer.

Optional Day 3 / Advanced Modules (deliverable as a 3rd day or a modular series)

  • Investigations: Entities, Relationships, and Timelines — extract people/orgs/dates, reconstruct email threads, build chronologies, map near-duplicates and document lineage. Lab: build a timeline and entity/relationship view.
  • Agentic and Multi-Step Legal Workflows (deep) — richer orchestration, contract analysis, multi-doc synthesis, tool use and guardrails as a design principle. Lab: build a multi-step workflow with a human checkpoint.
  • Deployment at Scale — on-premises and appliance deployment, distributed processing for large volumes, regulated environments (CJIS, government, higher-ed), hardware sizing. Lab: containerize and scale a processing job across workers.
  • Governance and Compliance Deep-Dive — the AI-regulation landscape (100+ US state AI laws, the EU AI Act), audit requirements, and a full SAIS-100 governance audit. Lab: audit a legal-AI system against a governance/defensibility checklist.

Requirements

  • Proficiency in Python and familiarity with basic APIs.
  • Helpful: user-level familiarity with Large Language Models (LLMs) — no machine learning background required, as we build the conceptual model from scratch.
  • No prior legal background needed — essential legal concepts are taught within context.

Audience

  • Software and AI engineers transitioning into legal tech.
  • Legal-tech company engineers requiring deeper domain expertise in law.
  • Technically minded legal, eDiscovery, or information-governance professionals who wish to build solutions rather than merely purchase them.
  • Anyone aspiring to the role of 'legal engineer' or 'AI legal engineer'.
 14 Hours

Number of participants


Price per participant

Testimonials (1)

Provisional Upcoming Courses (Require 5+ participants)

Related Categories